IN THE NEWS Building on the last post about taking al Qaeda's words seriously , it's fairly obvious that we are doing a poor job in winning the war of ideas, the other front in the war against terrorists. Where Islamist leaders, many from groups like al Qaeda and Hezbollah, can quote Aristotle's writings about tyrannicide to justify their actions, the American voice is much less sophisticated. Voice of America is the exception, and it's only because it provides decent news coverage that it's taken seriously at all. Residents of the Middle East, like people anywhere, are interested in an accurate depiction of daily events. Voice of America provides a credible newsfeed, but that's about it. The now-defunct but still live web site for the Coalition Provisional Authority represents the norm for American public diplomacy: amateurish, unconvincing, and written more for an American audience than an Iraqi one. Before the transfer of sovereignty, when boot camp click he web site officially stopped any further updates, its chirpy, good news tone was wildly out of sync with the bloody reality of sabotage, bombings, kidnappings, and street battles. But there's not really much else going in the American "public diplomacy" effort. ( Click here for a good discussion of this problem .

IN THE NEWS Building on the last post about taking al Qaeda's words seriously , it's fairly obvious that we are doing a poor job in winning the war of ideas, the other front in the war against terrorists. Where Islamist leaders, many from groups like al Qaeda and Hezbollah, can quote Aristotle's writings about tyrannicide to justify their actions, the American voice is much less sophisticated. Voice of America is the exception, and it's only because it provides decent news coverage that it's taken seriously at all. Residents of the Middle East, like people anywhere, are interested in an accurate depiction of daily events. Voice of America provides a credible newsfeed, but that's about it. The now-defunct but still live web site for the Coalition home loan with bad credit rovisional Authority represents the norm for American public diplomacy: amateurish, unconvincing, and written more for an American audience than an Iraqi one. Before the transfer of sovereignty, when the web site officially stopped any further updates, its chirpy, good news tone was wildly out of sync with the bloody reality of sabotage, bombings, kidnappings, and street battles. But there's not really much else going in the American "public diplomacy" effort. ( Click here for a good discussion of this problem .

IN THE NEWS Building on the last post about taking al Qaeda's words seriously , it's fairly obvious that we are doing a poor job in winning the war of ideas, the other front in the war against terrorists. Where Islamist leaders, many from groups like al Qaeda and Hezbollah, can quote Aristotle's writings about tyrannicide to justify their actions, the American voice is much less sophisticated. Voice of America is the exception, and it's only because it provides decent news coverage that it's taken seriously at all. Residents of the Middle East, like people anywhere, are interested in an accurate depiction of daily events. Voice of America provides a credible newsfeed, but that's about it. The now-defunct but still live web site for the Coalition Provisional Authority represents the norm for American public diplomacy: amateurish, unconvincing, and written more for an American audience than an Iraqi one. Before the transfer of sovereignty, when the web detective comics 27 ite officially stopped any further updates, its chirpy, good news tone was wildly out of sync with the bloody reality of sabotage, bombings, kidnappings, and street battles. But there's not really much else going in the American "public diplomacy" effort. ( Click here for a good discussion of this problem .

Adam Feibelman (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - School of Law) has posted Contract, Priority, and Odious Debt (North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 727, 2007) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: This Article proposes that sovereign nations and their creditors adopt a contractual approach to the seemingly intractable problem of odious debt. Odious debt is generally defined as an obligation incurred by a despotic or illegitimate leader that provides no value to the population of the sovereign. In recent years, spurred primarily by the financial problems of post-Hussein Iraq, many writers and commentators have proposed doctrinal and institutional mechanisms that would provide odious debt relief. These proposals all face practical challenges, and they would likely involve significant risk of destabilizing emergency loan inancial markets. Under a contractual approach, a majority or supermajority of a sovereign's creditors would have the power to identify odious obligations of the sovereign. The sovereign would then be obligated to repudiate these debts. Creditors should have good incentives to employ this arrangement discriminately. More than any other relevant actors, creditors will internalize the costs and benefits of odious debt relief. Even if the private benefits of contractual odious debt arrangements are modest, they might create significant positive externalities.

Good morning everyone! Today is jam-packed with goodness. Seriously. I'm hoping to write a bit, though I will probably only get started and then head over to the coffeeshop to meet Squid and our minister. Yep, we're having coffee with the minister of our church. Last sermon she started talking about the Myers-Briggs, so I emailed her to ask, was she an ENFP, perchance? trion air filter I should be," she said. "I've turned into an ENFJ out of guilt." Yep. ENFPs want to save the world. It's sort of their major thing. And when they try to organize and take it all on, they turn inexorably into ENFJs. I'm an INFP, so I do all the saving inside my head. It's far more convenient and a time-saver, to boot. Spent breakfast looking at the Staffnord Extension catalog. I wish I had time to take the class on modernism in art history. Cool! A slideshow every Tuesday night! It starts at 7, however, and I can't imagine making it to Paly anywhere near that time. The whole catalog is decorated with these etchings illustrating Hell. I was particularly amused by the juxtaposition of a depiction of several poor souls burning in eternal flames with the description of the "Learn Interpersonal Skills!" seminar. I must write a bit about This Boy's Life, which is the latest in my "twenty-something men's memoir" series, after I read Dave Eggers' book last summer. I can't help but be a mite irritated by the phenomenon, out of sheer jealousy, of course. Two things.

The complaint filed in Washington state related to the internet gambling ban is available here . I'm a little unclear on the facts, but the basic point in the complaint seems to be that Washington has legal gambling, including poker, and legal internet gambling, such as on horse-racing, but internet poker is banned. I have not looked at the actual statute to confirm whether that is the right interpretation of the law, however. There are a couple interesting bits of note in the complaint. First, one of the claims reads almost like one of Antigua's WTO claims: The IGB violates the U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl.3, The Commerce Clause, because it is a protectionist measure designed to discriminate against otherwise legal out-of-state businesses and in favor of in-state businesses. Gambling, internet gambling, and poker are all legal in Washington. Therefore, the obvious purpose of the IGB as it applies to internet poker is to force internet poker players to patronize in-state brick-and-mortar casinos rather than internet poker rooms, which are legal where domiciled and not illegal under federal law, or to switch their internet gambling from poker to horse racing. Such a discriminatory law is virtually deep freeze er se invalid as a violation of the Commerce Clause. Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S.

Adam Feibelman (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - School of Law) has posted Contract, Priority, and Odious Debt (North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 727, 2007) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: This Article proposes that sovereign nations and their creditors adopt a contractual approach to the seemingly intractable problem of odious debt. Odious debt is generally defined as an obligation incurred by a despotic or illegitimate leader that provides no value to the population of the sovereign. In recent years, spurred primarily by the financial problems of post-Hussein Iraq, many writers and commentators have proposed doctrinal and institutional mechanisms that would provide odious debt relief. These proposals all face michael's crafts ractical challenges, and they would likely involve significant risk of destabilizing financial markets. Under a contractual approach, a majority or supermajority of a sovereign's creditors would have the power to identify odious obligations of the sovereign. The sovereign would then be obligated to repudiate these debts. Creditors should have good incentives to employ this arrangement discriminately. More than any other relevant actors, creditors will internalize the costs and benefits of odious debt relief. Even if the private benefits of contractual odious debt arrangements are modest, they might create significant positive externalities.

Click Here

Click Here

IN THE NEWS Building on the last post about taking al Qaeda's words seriously , it's fairly obvious that we are doing a poor job in winning the war of ideas, the other front in the war against terrorists. Where Islamist leaders, many from groups like al Qaeda and Hezbollah, can quote Aristotle's writings about tyrannicide to justify their actions, the American voice is much less sophisticated. Voice of America is the exception, and it's only because it provides decent news coverage that it's taken seriously at all. Residents of the Middle East, like people anywhere, are interested in an accurate depiction of daily events. Voice of America provides a credible newsfeed, but that's about it. The now-defunct but still live web site for the Coalition Provisional Authority represents the direct mail promotions orm for American public diplomacy: amateurish, unconvincing, and written more for an American audience than an Iraqi one. Before the transfer of sovereignty, when the web site officially stopped any further updates, its chirpy, good news tone was wildly out of sync with the bloody reality of sabotage, bombings, kidnappings, and street battles. But there's not really much else going in the American "public diplomacy" effort. ( Click here for a good discussion of this problem .

The complaint filed in Washington state related to the internet gambling ban is available here . I'm a little unclear on the facts, but the basic point in the complaint seems to be that Washington has legal gambling, including poker, and legal internet gambling, such as on horse-racing, but internet poker is banned. I have not looked at the actual statute to confirm whether that is the right interpretation of the law, however. There are a couple interesting bits of note in the complaint. First, one of the claims reads almost like one of Antigua's WTO claims: The IGB violates the U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl.3, The Commerce Clause, because it is a protectionist measure designed to discriminate rebate information gainst otherwise legal out-of-state businesses and in favor of in-state businesses. Gambling, internet gambling, and poker are all legal in Washington. Therefore, the obvious purpose of the IGB as it applies to internet poker is to force internet poker players to patronize in-state brick-and-mortar casinos rather than internet poker rooms, which are legal where domiciled and not illegal under federal law, or to switch their internet gambling from poker to horse racing. Such a discriminatory law is virtually per se invalid as a violation of the Commerce Clause. Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S.

IN THE NEWS Building on the last post about taking al Qaeda's words seriously , it's fairly obvious that we are doing a poor job in winning the war of ideas, the other front in the war against terrorists. Where Islamist leaders, many from groups like al Qaeda and Hezbollah, can quote Aristotle's writings about tyrannicide to justify their actions, the American voice is much less sophisticated. Voice of America is the exception, and it's only because it provides decent news coverage that it's taken seriously at all. Residents of the Middle East, like people anywhere, are interested in an accurate depiction of daily events. Voice of America provides a credible newsfeed, but that's about it. The now-defunct but still live web site for the Coalition Provisional Authority represents the norm for American public diplomacy: amateurish, unconvincing, and written more for an American audience than an Iraqi one. Before the transfer of sovereignty, when the web site officially stopped any further updates, its chirpy, good news tone was wildly out of sync with the bloody reality of sabotage, bombings, kidnappings, and street battles. flower shop new york ut there's not really much else going in the American "public diplomacy" effort. ( Click here for a good discussion of this problem .

The complaint filed in Washington state related to the internet gambling ban is available here . I'm a little unclear on the facts, but the basic point in the complaint seems to be that Washington has legal gambling, including poker, and legal internet gambling, such as on horse-racing, but internet poker is banned. I have not looked at the actual statute to confirm whether that is the right interpretation of the law, however. There are a couple interesting bits of note in the complaint. First, one of the claims reads almost like one of Antigua's WTO claims: The IGB violates the U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl.3, The Commerce Clause, because it is a protectionist measure designed to discriminate against otherwise legal out-of-state businesses and in favor of in-state businesses. Gambling, internet gambling, and poker are all legal in Washington. Therefore, the obvious purpose of the IGB as it applies to internet poker is to force internet poker players to patronize in-state brick-and-mortar casinos rather trade show display unit han internet poker rooms, which are legal where domiciled and not illegal under federal law, or to switch their internet gambling from poker to horse racing. Such a discriminatory law is virtually per se invalid as a violation of the Commerce Clause. Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S.

IN THE NEWS Building on the last post about taking al Qaeda's words seriously , it's fairly obvious that we are doing a poor job in winning the war of ideas, the other front in the war against terrorists. Where Islamist leaders, many from groups like al Qaeda and Hezbollah, can quote Aristotle's writings about tyrannicide to justify their actions, the American voice is much less sophisticated. Voice of America is the exception, and it's only because it provides decent news coverage that it's taken seriously at all. Residents of the Middle East, like people anywhere, are interested in an accurate depiction of daily events. Voice of America provides a credible newsfeed, but that's about it. The now-defunct but still live web site for the Coalition Provisional Authority represents the norm for American public diplomacy: amateurish, unconvincing, and written more for an American audience than an Iraqi one. Before the transfer of sovereignty, when the web site officially stopped any further updates, its chirpy, good news tone was wildly out of sync with the bloody reality of sabotage, bombings, kidnappings, and street battles. But there's not really much barracuda spam firewall lse going in the American "public diplomacy" effort. ( Click here for a good discussion of this problem .